This is an older article but it's such a good fulcrum for the "funding open-source" conversation. It states the need for rewarding maintainers and explores the OSS funding space.
I think funding open-source is top of mine for everyone right now and the goal of a lot of different projects.
For example, OScoin. They are proposing a permissionless network protocol that enables an open-source crypto-economy based on the concept of inflation funding/block rewards. Their [#whitepaper](/crypto/new/whitepaper) : [http://oscoin.io/oscoin.pdf](http://oscoin.io/oscoin.pdf)
I'm really excited about OScoin's approach. Even though I am often questionable of "network approaches", I think it makes a whole lot of sense for open-source funding
Another one is SourceCred and their development on SourceGrain. SourceCred creates reputation networks for open-source projects. SourceGrain is the next step: project-specific cryptoassets, called grain, for open-source projects rewarded to developers for contributing to the project directly.
Check out the mission statement here: [https://github.com/sourcegrain/mission](https://github.com/sourcegrain/mission)
Lane Rettig's thread pulls great commentary from both projects after questioning the use of "crypto-economics" to drive network value:
"it's essential to divide value-creation along intrinsic vs. extrinsic lines. Creating value for folks _inside_ your economy with a token isn't hard. The hard part is creating _extrinsic_ value. This is the part that I find most projects skip or fail to appreciate."
[https://twitter.com/lrettig/status/1136608490632437760](https://twitter.com/lrettig/status/1136608490632437760)
What do other's think of these approaches to open-source funding?