A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69475 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69475 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
33.3K
0
33.3K
After the Capitol assault—and after losing his perch as Majority Leader—the senator finally denounced the outgoing President. Was it a moral reckoning or yet another act of political self-interest?
After the Capitol assault—and after losing his perch as Majority Leader—the senator finally denounced the outgoing President. Was it a moral reckoning or yet another act of political self-interest?
“But nobody who has watched McConnell closely over the years views his split with Trump as a genuine moral reckoning. “There is no way that McConnell has had an epiphany and will now change his fundamental approach,” Ornstein said. “He will always act ruthlessly when it serves his own interest.” Indeed, the most remarkable aspect of McConnell’s rupture with Trump may be not that it happened but, rather, that it took so long—and that the leader of the Party in Congress countenanced so much damage along the way.”
“But nobody who has watched McConnell closely over the years views his split with Trump as a genuine moral reckoning. “There is no way that McConnell has had an epiphany and will now change his fundamental approach,” Ornstein said. “He will always act ruthlessly when it serves his own interest.” Indeed, the most remarkable aspect of McConnell’s rupture with Trump may be not that it happened but, rather, that it took so long—and that the leader of the Party in Congress countenanced so much damage along the way.”
"McConnell’s accusation that the insurrectionists had been 'fed lies' was couched in the passive voice. It skipped over the fact that he hadn’t even acknowledged the outcome of the election himself until December 15th"
"McConnell’s accusation that the insurrectionists had been 'fed lies' was couched in the passive voice. It skipped over the fact that he hadn’t even acknowledged the outcome of the election himself until December 15th"
An excellent article well worth the read. It describes McConnell perfectly. He is for himself and no one else. He needs to be gone. Like so many other GOP party members he speaks out of both sides of his mouth and it all depends on which side he has the most to gain from. There is no loyalty in him.
An excellent article well worth the read. It describes McConnell perfectly. He is for himself and no one else. He needs to be gone. Like so many other GOP party members he speaks out of both sides of his mouth and it all depends on which side he has the most to gain from. There is no loyalty in him.
You know, the fact that he’s so heavily influenced by the response of “corporate America” is clear proof that our campaign finance system is undemocratic. Individual Americans have been responding the same way, but it had no impact on him at all.
You know, the fact that he’s so heavily influenced by the response of “corporate America” is clear proof that our campaign finance system is undemocratic. Individual Americans have been responding the same way, but it had no impact on him at all.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.