Bringing context and critique to the cultural moment. Deep dives, reviews, and debate encouraged.
40678 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Bringing context and critique to the cultural moment. Deep dives, reviews, and debate encouraged.
40678 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
2K
0
2K
Despite its supposed counterculture aspirations, cyberpunk clocks a lot more hours as a power fantasy than as an insightful commentary on society, technology, consciousness, and authority. It’s not just any power fantasy either: it’s specifically about and for Cool Guys, set against a lurid background of working-class and feminine suffering.
Despite its supposed counterculture aspirations, cyberpunk clocks a lot more hours as a power fantasy than as an insightful commentary on society, technology, consciousness, and authority. It’s not just any power fantasy either: it’s specifically about and for Cool Guys, set against a lurid background of working-class and feminine suffering.
this is really making me think like of how deeply ingrained are these tropes in cyberpunk... tbh i havent read much of the staples of the genre and this is really making me go like... wow. also great mention of le guin's on the commodification of fantasy, always forever relevant. Saving you some time with a TL,DR: Author thinks cyberpunk is more style than substance, is full of misogyny, and protagonists never have a real impact on the world at large. Now, my opinions: 1.- The "punk" moniker should be reclaimed and mean something. 2.- Dystopias, cyberpunk or otherwise, are places where progressive ideals have been squashed. Characters aren't paragons of virtue, they can't be. So misogyny, oppression, classism, etc. are features, not bugs.
this is really making me think like of how deeply ingrained are these tropes in cyberpunk... tbh i havent read much of the staples of the genre and this is really making me go like... wow. also great mention of le guin's on the commodification of fantasy, always forever relevant. Saving you some time with a TL,DR: Author thinks cyberpunk is more style than substance, is full of misogyny, and protagonists never have a real impact on the world at large. Now, my opinions: 1.- The "punk" moniker should be reclaimed and mean something. 2.- Dystopias, cyberpunk or otherwise, are places where progressive ideals have been squashed. Characters aren't paragons of virtue, they can't be. So misogyny, oppression, classism, etc. are features, not bugs.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.