The main issue is that the classical delineations of class, as oneâs relaÂtion to financial capital under the industrial mode of production, no lonÂger act as a satisfying way to understand the stratifications of our curÂrent society. RathÂer, we should understand class as a complex amalgamate of different forms of capital: financial, cultural, social, emotional, physioloÂgical (incluÂdÂing sexÂual) and informational. More on this new landscape of class in this endnote.[i] To this sketchy picture I would like to add one important detail: the interÂactions of âclassâ with spirituality and self-improvement.
The following is a slightly edited extract from Hanzi Freinachtâs book âNordic Ideology: A Metamodern Guide to Politics, Book Twoâ. This is the second book in a series on metamodern thought, a work of popular philosophy that investigates the nature of psychological development and its political implications.
There has been great confusion, especially among observers on the polÂiÂtical Left and other progressives, as to which role spirituality and related forms of self-improvement play in postindustrial society. The most common understanding is perhaps still that spirituality, espÂeciÂally of the New Age kind, is a dangerous distraction from ârealâ societal issues and social engagementâand that self-improveÂment courses offer an âindÂividualÂizationâ of societal ills and injustices. Such practices are often seen as allies to neo-liberal capitalism as âthe individualâ only has herself to blame and her own mind to work on: âdonât protest, just go home and meditateâ. I should especially address the issue as my own work âwhich focuses much on the inner development of the populationâcan be subject to similar reacÂtions.