"Algorithmic governance produces a facade of ultimate objectivity, where the former legitimated and authorized authority is displaced onto the instrumental aspect of technology, leaving nothing or no one to appeal to. Given that the predicted threat or event is in the future, what evidence, conditions, or rationale can one appeal to when it comes to the predictive statistical and psychometric classifications of algorithmic governance? There are no actual actions or event to defend, only the “history” of dividual data reaggregated with other data."