>"The first major blockchain conference I attended in person was this July at EthCC 4 in Paris. It was an amazing experience. I met so many people and learned about so many projects and gathered perspectives on where Ethereum is headed. But there was one common theme that concerned me -- this notion that DAOs = Voting."

This post already have more early than this post. [https://relevant.community/crypto/post/612f87fb90a23d0059bfa952](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/612f87fb90a23d0059bfa952)

Thanks for posting [@nile_oo](/user/profile/nile_oo) The thought of us just replicating "first past the post" makes me feel a bit sick so I'm glad there is more scrutiny on voting in DAOs. I'm optimistic about this though as technology will allow DAOs to pick and choose what kind of voting system they want to live under such as Quadratic Voting or Liquid Democracy to name a couple. It's not surprising that many of these DAOs have small teams because of the relationship between DAO membership and crypto adoption. I think this will resolve itself in most cases as adoption rates increase, and it is essential it does otherwise we are just replicating the legacy structures we bemoan.