A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69452 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69452 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
40.9K
0
40.9K
Would have loved to follow through on this story, unfortunately I'm not a WSJ subscriber 😔. Well from the little I could get,I understand that Sandberg's move to stop the publication of an article that would have revealed the existence of a temporary restraining order against Mr. Kotick was to his favor given his reputation but why 🤔?? (Their past??)
Would have loved to follow through on this story, unfortunately I'm not a WSJ subscriber 😔. Well from the little I could get,I understand that Sandberg's move to stop the publication of an article that would have revealed the existence of a temporary restraining order against Mr. Kotick was to his favor given his reputation but why 🤔?? (Their past??)
"Social media companies are so powerful, & so important to news companies, they can pressure them on how to cover news Meta’s Sheryl Sandberg pressured the Daily Mail to shelve a potential article about her then-boyfriend, Activision Blizzard’s Bobby Kotick."
"Social media companies are so powerful, & so important to news companies, they can pressure them on how to cover news Meta’s Sheryl Sandberg pressured the Daily Mail to shelve a potential article about her then-boyfriend, Activision Blizzard’s Bobby Kotick."
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.