A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69452 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69452 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
164K
0
164K
"The machinelike process of engaging with social media is sufficient to produce an unhappy consciousness that stems from self-loathing about one’s own participation in a system that affords no special privileges to being human, blurs the distinction between human and machine, and recasts everything fed into it into networks and data. This self-loathing is matched with a powerful cynicism about a fake world filled with fake people and populated by fake beliefs and sentiments. Everything’s fake, everyone’s a bot, and you can’t shake the nagging suspicion that you’re a fake bot too."
"The machinelike process of engaging with social media is sufficient to produce an unhappy consciousness that stems from self-loathing about one’s own participation in a system that affords no special privileges to being human, blurs the distinction between human and machine, and recasts everything fed into it into networks and data. This self-loathing is matched with a powerful cynicism about a fake world filled with fake people and populated by fake beliefs and sentiments. Everything’s fake, everyone’s a bot, and you can’t shake the nagging suspicion that you’re a fake bot too."
“social networks tend to erode the fiction of a coherent self and replace it with a datafied self revealed to us via the digital exhaust our online activity generates” — nice
“social networks tend to erode the fiction of a coherent self and replace it with a datafied self revealed to us via the digital exhaust our online activity generates” — nice
I believe that cringe perception is a product of groupthink. Each out-group considered cringeworthy is simultaneously the product and creator of an in-group not considered cringeworthy. No one wants to belong to a cringeworthy group. (Some groups purposely embrace the cringe with the same goal.) What exactly people believe is cringeworthy, though, depends on what group they belong to. This creates a vicious circle where those who self-identify as belonging to a given in-group do so through not belonging to the associated out-group.
I believe that cringe perception is a product of groupthink. Each out-group considered cringeworthy is simultaneously the product and creator of an in-group not considered cringeworthy. No one wants to belong to a cringeworthy group. (Some groups purposely embrace the cringe with the same goal.) What exactly people believe is cringeworthy, though, depends on what group they belong to. This creates a vicious circle where those who self-identify as belonging to a given in-group do so through not belonging to the associated out-group.
I agree that designations of cringe often map with the in-group(s) one associates with, but I also think there's a more universal idea of cringe that transcends group affiliations and enjoys wider consensus, the root of it being the disgust or embarrassment felt when witness to someone breaching the social contract or otherwise behaving in a way considered uncouth. Or, to draw from Erving Goffman's The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, cringe is the aversion people feel when encountering someone that deviates from the accepted "scripts" for social interaction and self-presentation. In that sense, I think people share cringe content as a way to virtue signal that one is attuned to these normative scripts.
I agree that designations of cringe often map with the in-group(s) one associates with, but I also think there's a more universal idea of cringe that transcends group affiliations and enjoys wider consensus, the root of it being the disgust or embarrassment felt when witness to someone breaching the social contract or otherwise behaving in a way considered uncouth. Or, to draw from Erving Goffman's The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, cringe is the aversion people feel when encountering someone that deviates from the accepted "scripts" for social interaction and self-presentation. In that sense, I think people share cringe content as a way to virtue signal that one is attuned to these normative scripts.
In my opinion, some social codes have millions of adherents, while others have just two or three. Still, human beings divide themselves up into groups based on the codes they adhere to (and, at the same time, define social codes based on the groups they belong to). I would be interested to hear examples of universal cringe. (I’m not familiar with the book– yet. Thanks for the recommendation.)
In my opinion, some social codes have millions of adherents, while others have just two or three. Still, human beings divide themselves up into groups based on the codes they adhere to (and, at the same time, define social codes based on the groups they belong to). I would be interested to hear examples of universal cringe. (I’m not familiar with the book– yet. Thanks for the recommendation.)
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.