A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69462 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69462 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
1
1
"Luxury in the Age of Fragmentation, however is a bit different. The gatekeepers no longer have much of a stronghold, so the definitions are unique and one group’s idea of luxury can vary wildly from another’s. The Maiyet customer’s socially sensitive and worldly view of the world stands in stark contrast, for instance, to the exclusive worldview of Lamborghini customer’s. These two brands will also most likely not share an overlapping consumer base." tldr: consumers define luxury for themselves. more signifier flattening.
"Luxury in the Age of Fragmentation, however is a bit different. The gatekeepers no longer have much of a stronghold, so the definitions are unique and one group’s idea of luxury can vary wildly from another’s. The Maiyet customer’s socially sensitive and worldly view of the world stands in stark contrast, for instance, to the exclusive worldview of Lamborghini customer’s. These two brands will also most likely not share an overlapping consumer base." tldr: consumers define luxury for themselves. more signifier flattening.
I would argue that this is nothing new - luxury brands have always created low cost goods that are accessible to the masses (i.e. Gucci perfume) and ostentatious displays of wealth have always been considered gauche by some - more interesting to me is the ways which new technologies allow us to signal luxury consumption without actually consuming anything at all.
I would argue that this is nothing new - luxury brands have always created low cost goods that are accessible to the masses (i.e. Gucci perfume) and ostentatious displays of wealth have always been considered gauche by some - more interesting to me is the ways which new technologies allow us to signal luxury consumption without actually consuming anything at all.
agree. definitely not new, they have always had their sub brands and entry point products. i actually think this is a pretty weak article, but might spark some interesting thoughts. any examples come to mind on the tech signaling luxury? (granted its friday afternoon) all i can think of is that recent nytimes article "human contact is now a luxury good".
agree. definitely not new, they have always had their sub brands and entry point products. i actually think this is a pretty weak article, but might spark some interesting thoughts. any examples come to mind on the tech signaling luxury? (granted its friday afternoon) all i can think of is that recent nytimes article "human contact is now a luxury good".
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.