A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69462 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A space for sharing and discussing news related to global current events, technology, and society.
69462 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
6
6
While searching for videos on the links between neurotransmitters and personality, I ran across Jordan Peterson. I can't not see this guy... either way, I think it's unfortunate that so much of the critique of this guy can't do well enough a job of separating the science and hypothesis from his preoccupations, and how those then get adapted to his social critique. They seem to often get so personal and gratuitous. [https://youtu.be/f511uRzsHhQ](https://youtu.be/f511uRzsHhQ)
While searching for videos on the links between neurotransmitters and personality, I ran across Jordan Peterson. I can't not see this guy... either way, I think it's unfortunate that so much of the critique of this guy can't do well enough a job of separating the science and hypothesis from his preoccupations, and how those then get adapted to his social critique. They seem to often get so personal and gratuitous. [https://youtu.be/f511uRzsHhQ](https://youtu.be/f511uRzsHhQ)
The current affairs article was a pretty good critique of his ‘philosophy’
The current affairs article was a pretty good critique of his ‘philosophy’
My problem isn't with the style, which is what I see a lot of that article too. It doesn't connect for me... The problem with him isn't how he writes or lectures, at least not off the bat. Anyone can appear to talk in circles. The Current Affair article really heats up when it finally starts talking about Peterson's apparent understanding of politics, protesting, civil rights. Which is also on point, because I think the only reason anyone has an opinion on him in the first place is because he hyped so hard over, and was wrong about the c16 bill.
My problem isn't with the style, which is what I see a lot of that article too. It doesn't connect for me... The problem with him isn't how he writes or lectures, at least not off the bat. Anyone can appear to talk in circles. The Current Affair article really heats up when it finally starts talking about Peterson's apparent understanding of politics, protesting, civil rights. Which is also on point, because I think the only reason anyone has an opinion on him in the first place is because he hyped so hard over, and was wrong about the c16 bill.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.