By my understanding, of all the communities on Relevant, Support is the one with the largest amount of posts that comes from direct members (not opinions of some people/sites out there that seems fascinating to members and they decide to share) - questions out of their inquisitive minds, an experience they feel will guide new members, discussions about other communities and how to get better generally on this platform. These have to be carefully typed in most cases, as opposed to what is obtainable in other communities where the bulk of the information is contained in a link that is copied and pasted. Support is where informations needed to thrive well in all those other communities is shared and discussed Now I'm concerned that it is allowed for a poster in other communities to throw their weight behind whatever post they are bringing in from without (by being able to upvote and bet on them) but it is not allowed in Support where the idea and writing of information shared is mostly done within. [@slava](/user/profile/slava) [@DrEllisJaruzel](/user/profile/DrEllisJaruzel) [@taylore](/user/profile/taylore) [@Druss](/user/profile/Druss) [@Relevant](/user/profile/Relevant) [@CryptoMan](/user/profile/CryptoMan) is there a questionable action or behavior this restriction is meant to check? My understanding is, the same way posts in other communities will go nowhere without the collective efforts of members voting them as relevant, write ups here in Support will amount to nothing as well no matter what, if they are not considered and voted relevant by the required members. I humbly request to know the rationale behind this. Cheers!