A space for introductions, questions, and updates from the Relevant Team New to Relevant? Check out [this guide](https://relevant.community/general/post/5f442f65800055001716f84f).
28815 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A space for introductions, questions, and updates from the Relevant Team New to Relevant? Check out [this guide](https://relevant.community/general/post/5f442f65800055001716f84f).
28815 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
57K
In recent times, as a community we have encountered some success and also some challenges. Growth comes with its own kind of challenges ranging from; malfunction of software due to bugs, dishonest members. I know Relevant is a community who backbone is trust. But we have to understand that when dealing with humans we must put up some rules to keep their activities on check. Thus going forward, I think we need to consider the following approach. Mandatory KYC. This will help us detect all fake accounts, bots. Also track members running more than one accounts. Trust me we have so many members running more than one accounts to cheat the system. Reduction of the amount tokens giving as Airdrop: I recommend this. The 40 Rel token given as Aitdrop should be cut down to 20. 5 Rel token For twitter sign up 5 Rel token for email verification 10 Rel tokens for KYC This will reduce the influx of bot and fake users and the coming-in of real, quality community members. It will also encourage Users to buy Rel tokens from exchange thus promoting demand and liquity. A cartoon like explanation video of what Relevant community is and the Dos and Don't of the community should be introduced. This should be what every new members should see first before going forward to use the software. All this necessary to build a quality productive quality and cut down on spammers. That's my suggestion. I hope this will be looked into. Thanks for the unique concept we have in the software. From a happy Relevant User.
0
57K
In recent times, as a community we have encountered some success and also some challenges. Growth comes with its own kind of challenges ranging from; malfunction of software due to bugs, dishonest members. I know Relevant is a community who backbone is trust. But we have to understand that when dealing with humans we must put up some rules to keep their activities on check. Thus going forward, I think we need to consider the following approach. Mandatory KYC. This will help us detect all fake accounts, bots. Also track members running more than one accounts. Trust me we have so many members running more than one accounts to cheat the system. Reduction of the amount tokens giving as Airdrop: I recommend this. The 40 Rel token given as Aitdrop should be cut down to 20. 5 Rel token For twitter sign up 5 Rel token for email verification 10 Rel tokens for KYC This will reduce the influx of bot and fake users and the coming-in of real, quality community members. It will also encourage Users to buy Rel tokens from exchange thus promoting demand and liquity. A cartoon like explanation video of what Relevant community is and the Dos and Don't of the community should be introduced. This should be what every new members should see first before going forward to use the software. All this necessary to build a quality productive quality and cut down on spammers. That's my suggestion. I hope this will be looked into. Thanks for the unique concept we have in the software. From a happy Relevant User.
I really like the idea the idea of an animated explainer video.
I really like the idea the idea of an animated explainer video.
I understand your point but you got it wrong, this is not a kind of technology to implement KYC, in fact I can't remember any chat or similar app that implements KYC just to deal with bots, that's censorship, in fact the whole idea is to decentralised the system. I agree to reduction but the reality they only need to strengthen the software and it's code. This is dapp, this is crypto, this is blockchain.
I understand your point but you got it wrong, this is not a kind of technology to implement KYC, in fact I can't remember any chat or similar app that implements KYC just to deal with bots, that's censorship, in fact the whole idea is to decentralised the system. I agree to reduction but the reality they only need to strengthen the software and it's code. This is dapp, this is crypto, this is blockchain.
Maybe you don't know. Alot of new cryptocurency projects are now adopting KYC. KYC doesn't affect decentralization in any way.. neither does it make a project centralised. What's most important is too have a community of real people. Instead of community filled with bots and faceless accounts. There is a perfect way to get this done without even stressing the Dev team on Identity verification. We have alot blockchain project for identity verification for example bloom. The programmers just need find a way to add bloom APi. So that every member will verify their identity through bloom simple. We can even use Civic or telegram.. I remember when I joined [Cocoricos.io](http://Cocoricos.io) was lead to telegram to verify my identity. I needed not upload any documents In the cocoricos website. In other words, the same way we connected or verified our email and twitter accounts. The development team can also add a third party identity verification project like Bloom, or , Civic. So before you connect this very one. You should have already completed kyc with them (Bloom or Civic). Such that as you connect it to relevant software you will be approved as verified. Simple..
Maybe you don't know. Alot of new cryptocurency projects are now adopting KYC. KYC doesn't affect decentralization in any way.. neither does it make a project centralised. What's most important is too have a community of real people. Instead of community filled with bots and faceless accounts. There is a perfect way to get this done without even stressing the Dev team on Identity verification. We have alot blockchain project for identity verification for example bloom. The programmers just need find a way to add bloom APi. So that every member will verify their identity through bloom simple. We can even use Civic or telegram.. I remember when I joined [Cocoricos.io](http://Cocoricos.io) was lead to telegram to verify my identity. I needed not upload any documents In the cocoricos website. In other words, the same way we connected or verified our email and twitter accounts. The development team can also add a third party identity verification project like Bloom, or , Civic. So before you connect this very one. You should have already completed kyc with them (Bloom or Civic). Such that as you connect it to relevant software you will be approved as verified. Simple..
You didn't get me so well, remember jurisdiction matters, if you implement KYC, you may be subjected to regulation with extra charges, payment and dues by the state you are operating from, but KYC is done by a reason of which shall be reasonable to both parties. Meanwhile I am more agree that the mechanism adopted by Relevant is the best way to deal with a bot, why because the platform doesn't operate by amount of money you put but rather reputation. If you read much of the reputation, you had find out it's far efficient than some of the KYC, why? Because assuming a bot post a content and all other bot joined to upvote it, even if it's million was vested of coins and 1million upvote it doesn't earn a penny for all of the participants. So the bot has no use, because it still require a work, and d coins is locked. But I agree to 2 of your suggestions but even, having to reduce the number of airdrop coins will reduce bots of course but may also affect real users joining when they feel d incentive is too small. I agree admin should look to verifying with telegram, that may help, but they Should only accept ones with username.
You didn't get me so well, remember jurisdiction matters, if you implement KYC, you may be subjected to regulation with extra charges, payment and dues by the state you are operating from, but KYC is done by a reason of which shall be reasonable to both parties. Meanwhile I am more agree that the mechanism adopted by Relevant is the best way to deal with a bot, why because the platform doesn't operate by amount of money you put but rather reputation. If you read much of the reputation, you had find out it's far efficient than some of the KYC, why? Because assuming a bot post a content and all other bot joined to upvote it, even if it's million was vested of coins and 1million upvote it doesn't earn a penny for all of the participants. So the bot has no use, because it still require a work, and d coins is locked. But I agree to 2 of your suggestions but even, having to reduce the number of airdrop coins will reduce bots of course but may also affect real users joining when they feel d incentive is too small. I agree admin should look to verifying with telegram, that may help, but they Should only accept ones with username.
its true relevant works with reputation not with no of upvotes, for example recently i upvoted a post of author who got a bad reputation but has 1600 upvotes but not a single penny awarded, kyc is not necessary it will decrease the future scope of relevant community cause no one wants to do kyc just to join a community.
its true relevant works with reputation not with no of upvotes, for example recently i upvoted a post of author who got a bad reputation but has 1600 upvotes but not a single penny awarded, kyc is not necessary it will decrease the future scope of relevant community cause no one wants to do kyc just to join a community.
I totally agree with you. You have presented some of the most important topics very flawlessly. Relevant needs to find a way to deal with bots or multiple accounts with new Technology.
I totally agree with you. You have presented some of the most important topics very flawlessly. Relevant needs to find a way to deal with bots or multiple accounts with new Technology.
KYC will help to reduce abuse in community
KYC will help to reduce abuse in community
KYC should not be mandatory. Technology advances. We should think of another way to defeat bot accounts. Relevant can implement 1 account per 1 IP.
KYC should not be mandatory. Technology advances. We should think of another way to defeat bot accounts. Relevant can implement 1 account per 1 IP.
i agree with all your suggestions but dont you think reduction of coins will reduce the upcoming new members. and we do not need to reduce the coins because these are not withdrawable. and i think the possible ways to impower the community is to advance the app and kyc.
i agree with all your suggestions but dont you think reduction of coins will reduce the upcoming new members. and we do not need to reduce the coins because these are not withdrawable. and i think the possible ways to impower the community is to advance the app and kyc.
Your point is good except for KYC which i don't agree ,because platform like relevant should be anonymous , yeah also use have the right be anonymous or not . So i don't KYC is thr right choice for development but other i deeply agree for them
Your point is good except for KYC which i don't agree ,because platform like relevant should be anonymous , yeah also use have the right be anonymous or not . So i don't KYC is thr right choice for development but other i deeply agree for them
I don't prefer KYC , as it isn't safe to give our documents i suggest to close the airdrop so new members signing up with zero relevant balance so if they want to earn , they have to buy REL from exchanges
I don't prefer KYC , as it isn't safe to give our documents i suggest to close the airdrop so new members signing up with zero relevant balance so if they want to earn , they have to buy REL from exchanges
Yeah i support you friend, it will burn abuser account and keep rel coin price stable, i see at slack because of youtuber teaching to abuser right? And one more thing i hope kyc live will be implemented soon 👍, keep it up with your rule
Yeah i support you friend, it will burn abuser account and keep rel coin price stable, i see at slack because of youtuber teaching to abuser right? And one more thing i hope kyc live will be implemented soon 👍, keep it up with your rule
Yep kyc is good idea to kick bot
Yep kyc is good idea to kick bot
Kyc live holding paper with relevant letter its ok for me, but kyc with documents is sensitive
Kyc live holding paper with relevant letter its ok for me, but kyc with documents is sensitive
It's true. I don't support it also. It's sensitive case
It's true. I don't support it also. It's sensitive case
Biology is the studied of living things
Biology is the studied of living things
kyc is not a good choice reduction of airdrop will do the trick
kyc is not a good choice reduction of airdrop will do the trick
Definitely very good ideas.. any platform should be fair to all users. abusers are unfortunately everywhere.. i have seen some users that were paid out 20k rel because of some bug and i have seen them cashout. these kind of incidents should also be fixed and reported asap, so that people would trust the fairness of the platform. Personally, I also wouldn't say KYC would be my first choice, but if it is the best one, I would definitely be happy to do it.
Definitely very good ideas.. any platform should be fair to all users. abusers are unfortunately everywhere.. i have seen some users that were paid out 20k rel because of some bug and i have seen them cashout. these kind of incidents should also be fixed and reported asap, so that people would trust the fairness of the platform. Personally, I also wouldn't say KYC would be my first choice, but if it is the best one, I would definitely be happy to do it.
Hi, [@AnthonyEzewudo](/user/profile/AnthonyEzewudo) , can I help you with the cartoon?
Hi, [@AnthonyEzewudo](/user/profile/AnthonyEzewudo) , can I help you with the cartoon?
Maybe do a blue check mark kind of approach. KYC gives you a blue check confirming you are who you say you are. This way it’s not mandatory but does effect credibility in a positive manner. Also instead of KYC, you could wait to see what IOHK does with decentralized ID’s. This might be a better solution than standard KYC and from the sound of what Charles has been saying... it’s it far off. Also I think multiple accounts does not necessarily mean cheating the system either. On most social media I have an account for personal use and business use. As for those saying social media sites don’t require KYC... this is true but they also don’t have a financial incentive program for their users. The closest thing to this would maybe be reddit it their coins... but that’s still not a 1:1 comparison here. Essentially I see both sides of this discussion going on, but I feel there’s maybe a better solution coming in the near future with DID’s. Thoughts?
Maybe do a blue check mark kind of approach. KYC gives you a blue check confirming you are who you say you are. This way it’s not mandatory but does effect credibility in a positive manner. Also instead of KYC, you could wait to see what IOHK does with decentralized ID’s. This might be a better solution than standard KYC and from the sound of what Charles has been saying... it’s it far off. Also I think multiple accounts does not necessarily mean cheating the system either. On most social media I have an account for personal use and business use. As for those saying social media sites don’t require KYC... this is true but they also don’t have a financial incentive program for their users. The closest thing to this would maybe be reddit it their coins... but that’s still not a 1:1 comparison here. Essentially I see both sides of this discussion going on, but I feel there’s maybe a better solution coming in the near future with DID’s. Thoughts?
Thanks for your thoughtful post and ideas! The team has been thinking about this issue for a some time and we have decided that the bests approach for now is to stop airdrops all together. This may slow down growth, but at the moment it can actually be a blessing for the dev team as it gives us time to focus on improving the app and patching up vulnerabilities. We would much rather have a healthy community than a rapid increase in users.
Thanks for your thoughtful post and ideas! The team has been thinking about this issue for a some time and we have decided that the bests approach for now is to stop airdrops all together. This may slow down growth, but at the moment it can actually be a blessing for the dev team as it gives us time to focus on improving the app and patching up vulnerabilities. We would much rather have a healthy community than a rapid increase in users.
I respect that... walk before you run... that’s a wise approach, especially when you’re trying to revolutionize an already established industry... the last thing you want is to explode in growth without being prepared for it. That can sink an otherwise wonderful project if things go wrong, because it gives the old guard something to point at and go “see we told you it wouldn’t work”. It’s also why I believe in [#ADA](/general/new/ADA) . Because they took the time to put the work to get it right, as opposed to trying to fix it while it’s growing. It also helps builds user and client confidence.
I respect that... walk before you run... that’s a wise approach, especially when you’re trying to revolutionize an already established industry... the last thing you want is to explode in growth without being prepared for it. That can sink an otherwise wonderful project if things go wrong, because it gives the old guard something to point at and go “see we told you it wouldn’t work”. It’s also why I believe in [#ADA](/general/new/ADA) . Because they took the time to put the work to get it right, as opposed to trying to fix it while it’s growing. It also helps builds user and client confidence.
This is great and welcome development. We stand to adhere and follow, Long Live and Prosperity Relevant
This is great and welcome development. We stand to adhere and follow, Long Live and Prosperity Relevant
Yes good idea and agree it would be better for building a healthy for the community for now. I guess it can always be reinstated at another point if the community feels it would be beneficial then.
Yes good idea and agree it would be better for building a healthy for the community for now. I guess it can always be reinstated at another point if the community feels it would be beneficial then.
I agree with this view of yours, as for now its needed, but as development get better, we had revisit this decision, because we need the users, that may give the platform experiment other utilities in future.
I agree with this view of yours, as for now its needed, but as development get better, we had revisit this decision, because we need the users, that may give the platform experiment other utilities in future.
The bestest possible decision you took sir. I believe Stopping Airdrop for now is a real Turn point at the moment for Relevant. I joined today just before you announced stopping of Airdrop. I am glad i joined the Community before the closure of Airdrop.
The bestest possible decision you took sir. I believe Stopping Airdrop for now is a real Turn point at the moment for Relevant. I joined today just before you announced stopping of Airdrop. I am glad i joined the Community before the closure of Airdrop.
Almost stupid idea as the graph of the market is increasing day by day and u guys had taken graph down step.....u guys could take the step by changing the terms and contions by keeping reward and refrell system same ....terms and condition would be kyc mndatory for refrell as well as.,to bet on post the account should be verified kyc and refrel reward could be increase instead of 5 coins .....this will not disturb the peaks of graphs and u guys could fix the error in system .... This will definitely work and u have the wonderful team dont listen all the stupid post this may not good for ur compony
Almost stupid idea as the graph of the market is increasing day by day and u guys had taken graph down step.....u guys could take the step by changing the terms and contions by keeping reward and refrell system same ....terms and condition would be kyc mndatory for refrell as well as.,to bet on post the account should be verified kyc and refrel reward could be increase instead of 5 coins .....this will not disturb the peaks of graphs and u guys could fix the error in system .... This will definitely work and u have the wonderful team dont listen all the stupid post this may not good for ur compony
Stop airdrop, only allow new members to buy REL and use it in upvoting. Delete all inactive accounts cause those are accounts run by multiple gang
Stop airdrop, only allow new members to buy REL and use it in upvoting. Delete all inactive accounts cause those are accounts run by multiple gang
Where can I find the Airdrop?
Where can I find the Airdrop?
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.