A focused study group for the discussion of economics and economic policy.
32036 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A focused study group for the discussion of economics and economic policy.
32036 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
11K
0
11K
"G.D.P., jobs and other indicators have all risen more slowly under Republicans for nearly the past century."
"G.D.P., jobs and other indicators have all risen more slowly under Republicans for nearly the past century."
Maybe one party is actually more interested in growth than rent-seeking?
Maybe one party is actually more interested in growth than rent-seeking?
The average income of Americans would be more than double its current level if the economy had somehow grown at the Democratic rate for all of the past 9 decades. The economy does much better under Democrats. Why?
The average income of Americans would be more than double its current level if the economy had somehow grown at the Democratic rate for all of the past 9 decades. The economy does much better under Democrats. Why?
“The average income of Americans would be more than double its current level if the economy had somehow grown at the Democratic rate for all of the past nine decades”.
“The average income of Americans would be more than double its current level if the economy had somehow grown at the Democratic rate for all of the past nine decades”.
Data to support your conclusions 👏🏼👏🏼
Data to support your conclusions 👏🏼👏🏼
“holds almost regardless of how you define success,” two economics professors at Princeton, Alan Blinder and Mark Watson, write. They describe it as “startlingly large.”
“holds almost regardless of how you define success,” two economics professors at Princeton, Alan Blinder and Mark Watson, write. They describe it as “startlingly large.”
The deep scheme has always been to funnel money from the middle and poor class to the upper class, while getting half of the votes of those being fleeced. It is quite the racket.
The deep scheme has always been to funnel money from the middle and poor class to the upper class, while getting half of the votes of those being fleeced. It is quite the racket.
A president has only limited control over the economy. And yet there has been a stark pattern in the United States for nearly a century. The economy has grown significantly faster under Democratic presidents than Republican ones.
A president has only limited control over the economy. And yet there has been a stark pattern in the United States for nearly a century. The economy has grown significantly faster under Democratic presidents than Republican ones.
>"G.D.P., jobs and other indicators have all risen faster under Democrats for nearly the past century."
>"G.D.P., jobs and other indicators have all risen faster under Democrats for nearly the past century."
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.