A focused study group for the discussion of economics and economic policy.
32036 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A focused study group for the discussion of economics and economic policy.
32036 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
41.4K
0
41.4K
[https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/technology/timpone-local-news-metric-media.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/technology/timpone-local-news-metric-media.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage) >"A nationwide operation of 1,300 local sites publishes coverage that is ordered up by Republican groups and corporate P.R. firms."
[https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/technology/timpone-local-news-metric-media.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/technology/timpone-local-news-metric-media.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage) >"A nationwide operation of 1,300 local sites publishes coverage that is ordered up by Republican groups and corporate P.R. firms."
I am not certain if this is economics proper, but it certainly touches on how incentives can modify behavior in problematic ways. It is also an important piece.
I am not certain if this is economics proper, but it certainly touches on how incentives can modify behavior in problematic ways. It is also an important piece.
Yes, I think it's better suited to the News section but such was the interest of the piece, it got my vote. Whilst I don't agree with the tactic, it's certainly smart...
Yes, I think it's better suited to the News section but such was the interest of the piece, it got my vote. Whilst I don't agree with the tactic, it's certainly smart...
I agree with Simon and yourself that it is a very important article but it's only tenously about economics. I still upvoted it because of its high quality content, but I think we have to be careful we're not opening the door to other articles that are only loosely about economics; unless we want to broaden the scope of this feed?
I agree with Simon and yourself that it is a very important article but it's only tenously about economics. I still upvoted it because of its high quality content, but I think we have to be careful we're not opening the door to other articles that are only loosely about economics; unless we want to broaden the scope of this feed?
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.