Pity that the writer doesn't even begin to mention where all the extra electricity will come from, nor does he address the elephants in the room that all climate change obsessives ignore... that CO2 is oxygen for the natural world, that _...Read More_

"The outlook for monarch butterflies isn't great right now. In fact, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, or IUCN, just added North America's monarchs to its list of endangered _...Read More_

"Planetary proletarianization should be a central issue for eco-socialism: capitalism produces an urbanized majority with no direct relation to the ecological conditions of _...Read More_

>"Integrating carbon trading markets is an embryonic step toward planetary realism."

>"And how we will not fight climate change"

The rich 'elites' like to lecture on 'climate change' and what we should all be doing about it; but what exactly are they doing about it?

"Turning the biggest oil companies over to public ownership would serve several goals at once, including climate resilience."

>"The degrowth movement argues that the only way toward an ecologically sustainable world it to redirect economies away from market imperatives."

"Arctic bomb cyclones, Jane PAC, Termination Shock revisited"

>"Community cooperatives and volunteer collectives promise to change capitalism for the better."

>"The dynamic of constant innovation and consumption is intrinsically unsustainable. It’s time to rethink endless economic growth."

[https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ipcc-climate-report-climate-change-economics-1316106/](https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ipcc-climate-report-climate-change-economics-1316106/) Climate scientists who are annoyed that economists don’t take climate science seriously should make at least a casual attempt to _...Read More_

>"China is ambitiously pursuing its space program and new scientific research as it considers technological development the power of the future."

“The global carbon budget is nearing exhaustion. To [stabilize] climate at 1.5^ we can emit no more than 420 gigatonnes of CO2. The horror scenario is not a second-coming of 1930s-style central planning, but the catastrophic trajectory _...Read More_