There are two facets of the glitch. The first borrows from the rhetoric of the sexual revolutions of the ’60s, ’70s and ’80s and has the goal of unwrapping a new form of intimacy that has yet to get the air time it deserves.

"Thus, the glitch encourages a slipping across, beyond, and through the stereotypical materiality of the corpus, extending beyond a coping mechanism in its offering of new transfigurations of corporeal sensuality" Whenever you see a paragraph or a paper or an article written like this, you can know for certain that the author is: A) trying to convince you that they are smart B) thinks they are very smart C) is actually rambling about pseudo-philosophical mumbo jumbo and trying to make it sound weighty, or indeed as if it makes any sense at all when in reality the entire concept doesnt make sense and doesnt provide any useful information besides the fevered inner workings of a feminist blogger who believes herself to be profound.