Bringing context and critique to the cultural moment. Deep dives, reviews, and debate encouraged.
40675 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Bringing context and critique to the cultural moment. Deep dives, reviews, and debate encouraged.
40675 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
3.7K
0
3.7K
The cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?
The cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?
>"The cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?"
>"The cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?"
Today's narrative of individualism in our influencers, our hustlers, those who embody the always-be-working ethos, have roots in Clinton’s rhetoric of the self—but the idle busywork and performance of productivity now are done in the name of “freedom.”
Today's narrative of individualism in our influencers, our hustlers, those who embody the always-be-working ethos, have roots in Clinton’s rhetoric of the self—but the idle busywork and performance of productivity now are done in the name of “freedom.”
The cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?
The cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?
he cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?
he cultural impetus to hustle is built on decades-old political language. Why not try idleness instead?
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.