A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53211 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53211 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
10.2K
0
10.2K
The draft language could mean a number of individuals interacting with crypto may have to start reporting their transactions.
The draft language could mean a number of individuals interacting with crypto may have to start reporting their transactions.
This could bring up to $30 billion into the bill’s “pay-fors,” according to a fact sheet also shared with CoinDesk.
This could bring up to $30 billion into the bill’s “pay-fors,” according to a fact sheet also shared with CoinDesk.
Thanks for posting The wording in this bill specific to cryptocurrencies is very ambiguous and I worry about its application. It really feels like another attempt by the legacy systems to hamstring this digital revolution with archaic regulation.
Thanks for posting The wording in this bill specific to cryptocurrencies is very ambiguous and I worry about its application. It really feels like another attempt by the legacy systems to hamstring this digital revolution with archaic regulation.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.