A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53459 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53459 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
391
0
391
>"Smart cities promise convenient, automated life for people, but they pose a serious threat to human privacy and freedom. Is a consensus possible?"
>"Smart cities promise convenient, automated life for people, but they pose a serious threat to human privacy and freedom. Is a consensus possible?"
A very Relevant topic and the article started well but didn't really go anywhere in the end. I felt it needed deeper discussion on how blockchains are inherently not private and how this will be tackled.
A very Relevant topic and the article started well but didn't really go anywhere in the end. I felt it needed deeper discussion on how blockchains are inherently not private and how this will be tackled.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.