A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53211 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53211 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
8
6.4
8
6.4
"The main principles of dynamic governance are known as consent, circles, and double-linking. In contrast to consensus, where everyone must agree on a decision, consent is reached when there are no remaining paramount objections. When a policy change is proposed, any objections are discussed, and if needed the proposal is revised. Giving consent does not mean the proposed decision is each member’s ideal, but rather that that they can live with the outcome and see no substantial reason why the group should not proceed. A sociocratic organization is comprised of multiple tiered, overlapping circles. A circle is a semi-independent team of individuals responsible for governing its domain according to the entity’s principles. This is the horizontal element, where everyone in the circle is a full member with equal say. But there’s also a vertical element: Each circle functions on a different level. For example, you might have staff members on level 1 of the hierarchy, managers on level 2, and a CEO and board on level 3." I REALLY like seeing more thought-out frameworks for governance. I think they are super important as we start visualizing governance in practice.
"The main principles of dynamic governance are known as consent, circles, and double-linking. In contrast to consensus, where everyone must agree on a decision, consent is reached when there are no remaining paramount objections. When a policy change is proposed, any objections are discussed, and if needed the proposal is revised. Giving consent does not mean the proposed decision is each member’s ideal, but rather that that they can live with the outcome and see no substantial reason why the group should not proceed. A sociocratic organization is comprised of multiple tiered, overlapping circles. A circle is a semi-independent team of individuals responsible for governing its domain according to the entity’s principles. This is the horizontal element, where everyone in the circle is a full member with equal say. But there’s also a vertical element: Each circle functions on a different level. For example, you might have staff members on level 1 of the hierarchy, managers on level 2, and a CEO and board on level 3." I REALLY like seeing more thought-out frameworks for governance. I think they are super important as we start visualizing governance in practice.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.