A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53424 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
A community for the latest discussions about the cutting edge of crypto design, it's culture and significant crypto news. Decentralize everything. Check out our [Community Guidelines](https://relevant.community/crypto/post/6122269e61d1cd005a877277/62427d3ed587ad005b647828)
53424 Members
We'll be adding more communities soon!
© 2020 Relevant Protocols Inc.
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
Relevant
Hot
New
Spam
0
391
0
391
Nice summary of the problem with proprietary "standards". Posting here because of relevance to location based crypto project FOAM [@ryan_foam](/user/profile/ryan_foam) [@arb](/user/profile/arb)
Nice summary of the problem with proprietary "standards". Posting here because of relevance to location based crypto project FOAM [@ryan_foam](/user/profile/ryan_foam) [@arb](/user/profile/arb)
Love this technique. You could use this for anything - job sites, part #’s etc. just bail on their implementation 😊
Love this technique. You could use this for anything - job sites, part #’s etc. just bail on their implementation 😊
Re FOAM: the tectonic shifting phenomenon is not one I’d ever thought of before with respect to GPS and location. Am I right to think that FOAM is better equipped to handle that since the nodes are on the ground themselves?
Re FOAM: the tectonic shifting phenomenon is not one I’d ever thought of before with respect to GPS and location. Am I right to think that FOAM is better equipped to handle that since the nodes are on the ground themselves?
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.
Some low-ranking comments may have been hidden.